A tale of mistaken identity has captivated Chicago and its visitors, but the truth behind the iconic 'rat hole' landmark may surprise you!
Unveiling the Windy City's Secret:
Imagine a city with a unique landmark, a mysterious imprint in a sidewalk, that has become a viral sensation. But here's the twist: it's not what you think!
The 'rat hole,' a popular attraction in Chicago's Roscoe Village, is not a secret hangout for gangsters or a hidden treasure trove. It's a fascinating story of an unfortunate creature's encounter with wet cement.
The Real Story Unveiled:
About 20 to 30 years ago, an unlucky animal got trapped in fresh cement, leaving behind a full-body impression. This imprint, resembling a spread-eagled rat, complete with tiny claws, limbs, and even a tail, has intrigued locals and tourists alike.
The rat hole went viral last year, attracting curious visitors who left coins and odd objects as tributes. However, the constant foot traffic caused complaints, leading to the removal of the original slab and its relocation to City Hall-County Building.
Debunking the Myth:
Researchers from renowned institutions have published a study that challenges the popular belief. They conclude that the rat hole was most likely not created by a rat but by a squirrel or a muskrat!
By analyzing online photos and comparing measurements with museum specimens, the researchers narrowed down the possibilities to mammals. The presence of arms, legs, and a tail ruled out birds, snakes, and reptiles. Further analysis revealed that the creature's forelimbs and hind paws were too large for a rat but matched the measurements of Eastern gray squirrels, fox squirrels, or muskrats.
The study acknowledged other researchers' theories about a squirrel being the culprit. Cement's wetness during the day and the absence of tracks suggest a squirrel's misstep, adding to the intrigue.
A New Name, A New Perspective:
The researchers propose renaming the specimen as the 'Windy City Sidewalk Squirrel,' a title that honors its probable origins and aligns with the evidence. This controversial interpretation invites further discussion and debate.
And this is the part most people miss: the absence of a bushy tail in the imprint. Hair often lacks the rigidity to create deep impressions, and it's not unusual for such details to be missing.
So, what do you think? Is it time to embrace the 'Windy City Sidewalk Squirrel' as the true identity of this iconic landmark? Share your thoughts and let's spark a conversation!
